Search found 7 matches

I was originally going to ask your opinions on some GUI design in the Design subforum, then decided I might as well make a thread for my whole project. So without further adieu...

Wizardstar

htt ...

I'm pretty sure cheap minigames about this are popping up on Newgrounds as we speak, so we're covered anyway.

Though it has been a year since the competition.

I'm pretty sure the AI will be hard no matter what I do, so I'm probably going to wing it when I get to it. At the very least, my AI might be some combination of "attack the closest enemy you can ...

But if I were designing it for an audience that wasn't already quite familiar with tactics-style games, I'm probably just break it up into being able to make a BIG move, a SPECIAL attack, or an atta ...

I think earlier editions of D&D assumed a certain level of movement in conjunction with a normal attack... then third edition changed it into move actions, attack actions, or a "full action&q ...

it's always a little annoying as a player trying to make that trade-off between movement and attacks. You always feel like you are "sacrificing" an attack to move
Being able to trade attack ...

This is for a turn-based tactical RPG like Shining Force and Fire Emblem.

What kind of movement systems do you like in these kinds of games? Do you like systems where a character first moves then ...